Triage, review context, and the tickets nobody wants to read.
Not a coding assistant — your engineers already have one of those. This is the work around the code: reading the inbound issues, gathering what a reviewer needs, and assembling the release notes from what actually shipped.
Get a demoAn engineering AI coworker handles the work around the code rather than the code itself: triaging inbound issues against the tracker and the history, gathering the context a reviewer needs before they open the diff, and assembling release notes and status from what was actually merged.
What an engineering coworker owns
Three jobs around the code, none of which are writing it.
See how we build yours →Read, reproduced where it can be, labelled, and routed to the team that owns the area
The related tickets, the previous attempt, and the decision that explains the odd bit
Notes assembled from what merged, with the customer-visible changes separated out
Everything an engineering coworker does, in one place
Eight capabilities, none of which require write access to your repository.
Issue triage
Read, reproduced where it can be, labelled, and routed to the team that owns the area.
Duplicate merging
Matches a new report against the history instead of opening the same bug for a fourth time.
Review context
The related tickets, the previous attempt, and the decision that explains the odd bit.
Release notes
Assembled from what merged, with the customer-visible changes separated from the rest.
Reporter follow-up
Goes back for the steps, the file, and the version, so the ticket stops being unactionable.
Runbook checks
Notices when the documented procedure and the actual system have drifted apart.
No merge rights
It reads the repository history. Write access to the code is not required and not requested.
Inside your network
Internal services and private registries are reachable without exposing any of them.
The queue, sorted and explained
What it labelled, what it merged, what it could not reproduce, and what it sent to a person — all in the tracker your team already reads.
See what gets logged →The work around the work
None of it is why anyone joined an engineering team. All of it still takes an afternoon a week.
Questions engineering leads ask
Starting with the one everyone asks first.
No. Your engineers already have one and it lives in the editor. This owns the work around the code: triaging what comes in, gathering context for reviews, keeping status true, and assembling release notes. It is the administrative load, not the authoring.
No, and it does not ask for it. It reads the tracker, the history, and the documentation, and writes only where you allow it to — usually the tracker and a status channel. If you later want it to open a draft pull request, that is a scoped permission you issue deliberately.
It says so, attaches what it tried, and routes the issue to a person rather than guessing at a label. A wrong label costs more than no label, so the ambiguous case is escalated by default.
It runs inside your network, so internal services, private registries, and the tooling that was never exposed to the internet are all reachable. That is usually the difference between useful triage and superficial triage.
Read access to the tracker and the repository history, and one engineer who can describe how issues actually get sorted today — including the informal rules that are not written down anywhere.
“Nobody joined an engineering team to merge duplicate bug reports. It still takes an afternoon a week.”
Crash on export, no steps given.
reproduced · matched to #1840 · routed✓ Reporter asked for the filePut an AI coworker
inside your own cloud.
Bring your issue backlog. We will show you what it would have sorted.
Get a demo